Companies Act

Small Company under Companies Act: ₹10 Crore/₹100 Crore Test, Exclusions and Compliance Benefits

A practical guide to the small-company definition under the Companies Act, including the ₹10 crore capital and ₹100 crore turnover tests, statutory exclusions, compliance relaxations and year-end classification checklist.

Small Company under Companies Act: ₹10 Crore/₹100 Crore Test, Exclusions and Compliance Benefits

A “small company” under the Companies Act, 2013 is not a separate form of incorporation. It is a statutory classification that can reduce several compliance burdens for an eligible company. The classification therefore matters to company secretaries, auditors, finance teams and promoters when they plan annual filings, Board meetings and audit reporting.

The starting point is section 2(85) of the Companies Act, 2013. The current Companies Act text available through India Code provides that a small company must be a company other than a public company, must remain within the prescribed paid-up capital and turnover limits, and must not fall within specified excluded categories.

What are the current small-company thresholds?

With effect from 1 December 2025, the prescribed limits are paid-up share capital not exceeding ₹10 crore and turnover not exceeding ₹100 crore. An ICAI regional student publication discussing the December 2025 MCA amendment records the revised thresholds and explains that both financial conditions have to be satisfied.

The turnover test is linked to turnover as per the profit and loss account for the immediately preceding financial year. This means classification should be tested using the statutory definition and the relevant prior-year financial data, not by looking only at current-year sales or a management estimate.

Both financial conditions must be satisfied

A company does not qualify merely because one number is within the limit. The statutory wording uses an “and” between the paid-up capital and turnover limbs. Therefore, the company must be within both the prescribed paid-up share capital limit and the prescribed turnover limit, in addition to satisfying the entity-type conditions.

Example 1: both limits are within range

Assume ABC Private Limited has paid-up share capital of ₹6 crore and turnover of ₹72 crore as per the relevant preceding financial year's profit and loss account. It is not a holding company, subsidiary company, section 8 company or company governed by a special Act. On these assumptions, both financial thresholds are within the current prescribed limits and none of the statutory exclusions applies, so it can qualify as a small company.

Example 2: one threshold is breached

Assume XYZ Private Limited has paid-up share capital of ₹3 crore but relevant turnover of ₹112 crore. The capital figure is within the limit, but the turnover figure is not. It therefore fails the small-company test for that classification exercise.

Which companies are excluded even if they are financially small?

Section 2(85) expressly excludes three categories from the small-company definition: a holding company or subsidiary company; a company registered under section 8; and a company or body corporate governed by a special Act. These exclusions apply even where the capital and turnover figures are below the prescribed thresholds.

A common mistake is to equate “private company” with “small company.” Many small companies are private companies, but not every private company is a small company. A private subsidiary, for example, remains outside the definition because of the statutory exclusion.

Small company is different from MSME classification

“Small company” under the Companies Act and “micro or small enterprise” under the MSME framework are different legal classifications. They use different statutes, tests and consequences. A company can therefore be small under one framework and not under the other, or vice versa.

Finance teams should keep the labels separate in compliance checklists. Small-company status affects Companies Act compliance. MSME status can affect matters such as supplier classification, delayed-payment rules and other MSME-specific benefits or obligations.

Why does small-company status matter?

The Companies Act and related rules provide targeted relaxations to small companies. The exact benefit should always be checked against the provision being applied rather than assumed from the label alone. Important recurring areas include a reduced Board-meeting frequency, an abridged annual-return route, relief from including a cash-flow statement in the financial statements, reduced penalty treatment under specified provisions, and exemption from CARO reporting where the applicable order provides it.

These are separate relaxations with their own conditions. Small-company status does not mean that the company is exempt from the Companies Act, annual ROC filing or statutory audit altogether.

Board meeting relaxation

Section 173 provides a relaxed meeting pattern for a small company: at least one Board meeting in each half of a calendar year, with a gap of not less than 90 days between the two meetings. This is different from the standard rule requiring at least four Board meetings every year with not more than 120 days between two consecutive meetings.

The compliance calendar should therefore be based on the company's classification for the relevant period. A company that no longer qualifies should not continue using the relaxed small-company calendar without retesting the law.

Annual return and financial-statement impact

Small companies use the abridged annual-return framework prescribed for them rather than automatically following every requirement applicable to larger companies. The Companies Act also excludes a small company from the mandatory cash-flow-statement component of the statutory definition of financial statements.

These relaxations reduce reporting volume, but they do not eliminate the need to prepare reliable accounts, obtain the required audit, approve financial statements and complete applicable ROC filings.

CARO and statutory audit are not the same question

Small companies are excluded from CARO 2020 reporting under the applicable order. That does not mean statutory audit disappears. CARO is an additional reporting framework attached to the auditor's report for covered companies; the core statutory audit requirement should be analysed separately.

For audit planning, the team should therefore document two conclusions independently: whether the company qualifies as a small company, and what that classification changes in the applicable audit-reporting framework.

Practical year-end classification checklist

  1. Confirm entity type: verify that the entity is a company other than a public company.
  2. Check statutory exclusions: identify whether it is a holding company, subsidiary, section 8 company or governed by a special Act.
  3. Verify paid-up share capital: compare the relevant figure with the current prescribed ₹10 crore ceiling.
  4. Verify turnover: use turnover from the profit and loss account for the immediately preceding financial year and compare it with the ₹100 crore ceiling.
  5. Apply both tests together: do not qualify the company when only one financial condition is satisfied.
  6. Document the conclusion: retain the capital, turnover, group-structure and entity-status evidence supporting the classification.
  7. Map each relaxation separately: after classification, identify which Board, filing, financial-statement, audit-reporting or penalty provisions actually provide a small-company benefit.
  8. Retest periodically: do not carry forward last year's classification automatically when turnover, capital or group structure has changed.

Common mistakes to avoid

  • Assuming every private limited company is a small company.
  • Using an “either/or” approach to the capital and turnover thresholds instead of satisfying both.
  • Ignoring the holding-company or subsidiary-company exclusion.
  • Using current-year projected turnover when the statutory test refers to the immediately preceding financial year's profit and loss account.
  • Confusing Companies Act small-company status with MSME registration or classification.
  • Assuming small-company status removes statutory audit or annual ROC filing altogether.
  • Continuing to claim relaxations without retesting status after a capital increase, turnover growth or group restructuring.

Practical takeaway

Small-company status should be treated as an annual compliance classification, not a permanent label. Under the current framework, the company must be within both the ₹10 crore paid-up capital and ₹100 crore turnover limits and must not fall within the statutory exclusions. Once that test is documented, finance and secretarial teams should map the specific relaxations that actually apply and retest the status whenever the company's financial size or group structure changes.

Related Articles

Subscribe To Our Newsletter

Subscribe us to get updates on latest Jobs Openings, News, Articles, Notices/ Circulars

Submit

© 2026 CA Samaaj. All rights reserved.

Join Whatsapp Group of CA Samaaj